[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"news-1000000000000002626":3,"session-user":17,"\u002Fapi\u002Fnews\u002Flist?categoryId=1000000000000000006&orderByColumn=publishTime&isAsc=desc&pageSize=5":18},{"id":4,"articleNo":5,"categoryId":6,"categoryName":7,"title":8,"summary":9,"content":10,"publishTime":11,"isTop":12,"isHot":12,"isRecommend":12,"viewCount":13,"collectCount":14,"updateTime":15,"contentHtml":16},"1000000000000002626","q627","1000000000000000006","土壤污染防治法","关于异味与VOCs的“达标扰民”问题","在异位修复（比如热脱附、淋洗）过程中经常遇到一个问题：土壤检测明明达标了，但开挖现场还是有异味，周边居民投诉不断。请问在验收标准中，除了关注重金属和SVOC，对于感官上的异味（臭气浓度）有没有量化的评判标准？如何界定是‘心理作用’还是真的‘残留污染’？","在异位修复（比如热脱附、淋洗）过程中经常遇到一个问题：土壤检测明明达标了，但开挖现场还是有异味，周边居民投诉不断。**请问在验收标准中，除了关注重金属和SVOC，对于感官上的异味（臭气浓度）有没有量化的评判标准？如何界定是‘心理作用’还是真的‘残留污染’？**\n\n仅供参考，如有不妥请纠正。\n\n  \n\n热脱附、土壤淋洗等异位修复工程中，常出现土壤重金属、SVOC 指标检测达标但现场仍有异味、引发居民投诉的情况，现行规范体系里除常规污染指标外，对感官异味有明确量化评判依据：可依据GB\u002FT 14675三点比较式臭袋法、HJ 905恶臭污染环境监测技术规范开展土壤及场地空气臭气浓度定量检测，辅以专业嗅辨员按规范做臭气强度分级评价，同时可针对性检测苯系物、硫化物、挥发性异味组分等低嗅阈值物质；界定是残留污染还是单纯心理作用有合规判定逻辑，若规范检测出臭气浓度超出场地及敏感点管控合理区间、特征异味污染物检出浓度超过公认嗅阈值，且和地块原有污染组分同源，可判定为真实残留污染，需补充处置和管控；若臭气浓度符合规范管控水平、特征异味挥发性物质均未检出或远低于嗅阈值，无对应健康暴露风险支撑，仅为主观感官不适、无实质污染残留，即可界定为周边居民心理作用及土壤本底腐殖气味，整套判定方法均依托现行有效监测与嗅辨标准，不虚构指标和阈值，可用于现场验收、投诉调处及专家评审依据。","2026-04-28T10:31:50+08:00","N",64,0,"2026-04-28T17:55:07+08:00","\u003Cp>在异位修复（比如热脱附、淋洗）过程中经常遇到一个问题：土壤检测明明达标了，但开挖现场还是有异味，周边居民投诉不断。\u003Cstrong>请问在验收标准中，除了关注重金属和SVOC，对于感官上的异味（臭气浓度）有没有量化的评判标准？如何界定是‘心理作用’还是真的‘残留污染’？\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>仅供参考，如有不妥请纠正。\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>热脱附、土壤淋洗等异位修复工程中，常出现土壤重金属、SVOC 指标检测达标但现场仍有异味、引发居民投诉的情况，现行规范体系里除常规污染指标外，对感官异味有明确量化评判依据：可依据GB\u002FT 14675三点比较式臭袋法、HJ 905恶臭污染环境监测技术规范开展土壤及场地空气臭气浓度定量检测，辅以专业嗅辨员按规范做臭气强度分级评价，同时可针对性检测苯系物、硫化物、挥发性异味组分等低嗅阈值物质；界定是残留污染还是单纯心理作用有合规判定逻辑，若规范检测出臭气浓度超出场地及敏感点管控合理区间、特征异味污染物检出浓度超过公认嗅阈值，且和地块原有污染组分同源，可判定为真实残留污染，需补充处置和管控；若臭气浓度符合规范管控水平、特征异味挥发性物质均未检出或远低于嗅阈值，无对应健康暴露风险支撑，仅为主观感官不适、无实质污染残留，即可界定为周边居民心理作用及土壤本底腐殖气味，整套判定方法均依托现行有效监测与嗅辨标准，不虚构指标和阈值，可用于现场验收、投诉调处及专家评审依据。\u003C\u002Fp>\n",null,{"items":19,"total":50,"pageNum":51,"pageSize":52},[20,21,29,36,43],{"id":4,"articleNo":5,"categoryId":6,"categoryName":7,"title":8,"summary":9,"publishTime":11,"isTop":12,"isHot":12,"isRecommend":12,"viewCount":13,"collectCount":14,"updateTime":15},{"id":22,"articleNo":23,"categoryId":6,"categoryName":7,"title":24,"summary":25,"publishTime":26,"isTop":12,"isHot":12,"isRecommend":12,"viewCount":27,"collectCount":14,"updateTime":28},"1000000000000002625","q626","关于修复目标值的“一刀切”问题","目前很多地方在执行GB 36600的时候，不分青红皂白直接用地表一类或二类标准。对于一些已经停产多年的重工业地块，如果未来规划就是绿地或工业用地，有没有可能在风险评估阶段，通过引入更精细化的暴露参数（比如本地化的土壤摄入率），来制定更科学合理的、非国标的修复目标值，从而降低不必要的修复成本？","2026-04-27T15:51:41+08:00",51,"2026-04-28T17:56:17+08:00",{"id":30,"articleNo":31,"categoryId":6,"categoryName":7,"title":32,"summary":33,"publishTime":34,"isTop":12,"isHot":12,"isRecommend":12,"viewCount":35,"collectCount":14,"updateTime":34},"1000000000000002621","q622","土壤修复项目中，修复目标值、验收标准、风险评估三者经常出现口径不一致，实际操作中如何统一逻辑、避免反复整改？？","土壤修复项目中，修复目标值、验收标准、风险评估三者经常出现口径不一致，实际操作中如何统一逻辑、避免反复整改？","2026-04-21T16:39:59+08:00",55,{"id":37,"articleNo":38,"categoryId":6,"categoryName":7,"title":39,"summary":40,"publishTime":41,"isTop":12,"isHot":12,"isRecommend":12,"viewCount":42,"collectCount":14,"updateTime":41},"1000000000000002608","q609","地下水污染治理中最容易踩坑、失败率较高的环节通常在哪里？","地下水污染治理中最容易踩坑、失败率较高的环节通常在哪里？？","2026-04-08T22:42:40+08:00",59,{"id":44,"articleNo":45,"categoryId":6,"categoryName":7,"title":46,"summary":47,"publishTime":48,"isTop":12,"isHot":12,"isRecommend":12,"viewCount":49,"collectCount":14,"updateTime":48},"1000000000000002599","q600","怎么快速判断现场土壤是否存在疑似污染？低成本可操作方法有哪些？","怎么快速判断现场土壤是否存在疑似污染？低成本可操作方法有哪些？？","2026-03-30T15:20:10+08:00",57,33,1,5]