[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"news-1000000000000002608":3,"session-user":16,"\u002Fapi\u002Fnews\u002Flist?categoryId=1000000000000000006&orderByColumn=publishTime&isAsc=desc&pageSize=5":17},{"id":4,"articleNo":5,"categoryId":6,"categoryName":7,"title":8,"summary":9,"content":10,"publishTime":11,"isTop":12,"isHot":12,"isRecommend":12,"viewCount":13,"collectCount":14,"updateTime":11,"contentHtml":15},"1000000000000002608","q609","1000000000000000006","土壤污染防治法","地下水污染治理中最容易踩坑、失败率较高的环节通常在哪里？","地下水污染治理中最容易踩坑、失败率较高的环节通常在哪里？？","地下水污染治理中最容易踩坑、失败率较高的环节通常在哪里？？\n\n1.前期调查精度不够，监测井数量不足、深度不对，导致污染范围、层数判断严重不准，方案从根上就错。\n\n2.污染源没有彻底切断，只处理地下水，不处理残留土壤、渗漏源，持续补给污染，治理永远赶不上污染速度。\n\n3.不看水文地质条件硬套技术，比如在低渗透土层用原位氧化，药剂扩散不到位，效果极差。\n\n4.修复目标定得过高，盲目追求背景值，不结合风险管控，导致工期无限拉长、成本严重超支。\n\n5.忽视污染反弹，短期达标就停止工程，残留污染物缓慢溶出，一段时间后再次超标。\n\n6.监测系统设计不合理，无法真实反映治理效果，导致误判、返工。","2026-04-08T22:42:40+08:00","N",59,0,"\u003Cp>地下水污染治理中最容易踩坑、失败率较高的环节通常在哪里？？\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>1.前期调查精度不够，监测井数量不足、深度不对，导致污染范围、层数判断严重不准，方案从根上就错。\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>2.污染源没有彻底切断，只处理地下水，不处理残留土壤、渗漏源，持续补给污染，治理永远赶不上污染速度。\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>3.不看水文地质条件硬套技术，比如在低渗透土层用原位氧化，药剂扩散不到位，效果极差。\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>4.修复目标定得过高，盲目追求背景值，不结合风险管控，导致工期无限拉长、成本严重超支。\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>5.忽视污染反弹，短期达标就停止工程，残留污染物缓慢溶出，一段时间后再次超标。\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>6.监测系统设计不合理，无法真实反映治理效果，导致误判、返工。\u003C\u002Fp>\n",null,{"items":18,"total":50,"pageNum":51,"pageSize":52},[19,27,35,42,43],{"id":20,"articleNo":21,"categoryId":6,"categoryName":7,"title":22,"summary":23,"publishTime":24,"isTop":12,"isHot":12,"isRecommend":12,"viewCount":25,"collectCount":14,"updateTime":26},"1000000000000002626","q627","关于异味与VOCs的“达标扰民”问题","在异位修复（比如热脱附、淋洗）过程中经常遇到一个问题：土壤检测明明达标了，但开挖现场还是有异味，周边居民投诉不断。请问在验收标准中，除了关注重金属和SVOC，对于感官上的异味（臭气浓度）有没有量化的评判标准？如何界定是‘心理作用’还是真的‘残留污染’？","2026-04-28T10:31:50+08:00",64,"2026-04-28T17:55:07+08:00",{"id":28,"articleNo":29,"categoryId":6,"categoryName":7,"title":30,"summary":31,"publishTime":32,"isTop":12,"isHot":12,"isRecommend":12,"viewCount":33,"collectCount":14,"updateTime":34},"1000000000000002625","q626","关于修复目标值的“一刀切”问题","目前很多地方在执行GB 36600的时候，不分青红皂白直接用地表一类或二类标准。对于一些已经停产多年的重工业地块，如果未来规划就是绿地或工业用地，有没有可能在风险评估阶段，通过引入更精细化的暴露参数（比如本地化的土壤摄入率），来制定更科学合理的、非国标的修复目标值，从而降低不必要的修复成本？","2026-04-27T15:51:41+08:00",51,"2026-04-28T17:56:17+08:00",{"id":36,"articleNo":37,"categoryId":6,"categoryName":7,"title":38,"summary":39,"publishTime":40,"isTop":12,"isHot":12,"isRecommend":12,"viewCount":41,"collectCount":14,"updateTime":40},"1000000000000002621","q622","土壤修复项目中，修复目标值、验收标准、风险评估三者经常出现口径不一致，实际操作中如何统一逻辑、避免反复整改？？","土壤修复项目中，修复目标值、验收标准、风险评估三者经常出现口径不一致，实际操作中如何统一逻辑、避免反复整改？","2026-04-21T16:39:59+08:00",55,{"id":4,"articleNo":5,"categoryId":6,"categoryName":7,"title":8,"summary":9,"publishTime":11,"isTop":12,"isHot":12,"isRecommend":12,"viewCount":13,"collectCount":14,"updateTime":11},{"id":44,"articleNo":45,"categoryId":6,"categoryName":7,"title":46,"summary":47,"publishTime":48,"isTop":12,"isHot":12,"isRecommend":12,"viewCount":49,"collectCount":14,"updateTime":48},"1000000000000002599","q600","怎么快速判断现场土壤是否存在疑似污染？低成本可操作方法有哪些？","怎么快速判断现场土壤是否存在疑似污染？低成本可操作方法有哪些？？","2026-03-30T15:20:10+08:00",57,33,1,5]