[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"news-1000000000000002588":3,"\u002Fapi\u002Fnews\u002Flist?categoryId=1000000000000000006&orderByColumn=publishTime&isAsc=desc&pageSize=5":16,"session-user":58},{"id":4,"articleNo":5,"categoryId":6,"categoryName":7,"title":8,"summary":9,"content":10,"publishTime":11,"isTop":12,"isHot":12,"isRecommend":12,"viewCount":13,"collectCount":14,"updateTime":11,"contentHtml":15},"1000000000000002588","q589","1000000000000000006","土壤污染防治法","土壤采样，如何确定合适的采样深度？","土壤采样，如何确定合适的采样深度？ ？","土壤采样，如何确定合适的采样深度？ ？\n\n土壤采样容易出现一些错误：  \n\n  仅采集表层土壤（如0-20 cm），忽略深层土壤的污染情况。  \n\n   采样深度不一致，导致数据可比性差。  \n\n解决方案：  \n\n   根据污染物的迁移特性确定采样深度。例如，重金属污染通常集中在表层，而有机污染物可能迁移至深层。  \n\n  -采用分层采样法，按固定深度（如0-20 cm、20-40 cm、40-60 cm）采集样品。","2025-03-24T08:39:43+08:00","N",878,0,"\u003Cp>土壤采样，如何确定合适的采样深度？ ？\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>土壤采样容易出现一些错误：  \u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>  仅采集表层土壤（如0-20 cm），忽略深层土壤的污染情况。  \u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>   采样深度不一致，导致数据可比性差。  \u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>解决方案：  \u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>   根据污染物的迁移特性确定采样深度。例如，重金属污染通常集中在表层，而有机污染物可能迁移至深层。  \u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>  -采用分层采样法，按固定深度（如0-20 cm、20-40 cm、40-60 cm）采集样品。\u003C\u002Fp>\n",{"items":17,"total":55,"pageNum":56,"pageSize":57},[18,26,34,41,48],{"id":19,"articleNo":20,"categoryId":6,"categoryName":7,"title":21,"summary":22,"publishTime":23,"isTop":12,"isHot":12,"isRecommend":12,"viewCount":24,"collectCount":14,"updateTime":25},"1000000000000002626","q627","关于异味与VOCs的“达标扰民”问题","在异位修复（比如热脱附、淋洗）过程中经常遇到一个问题：土壤检测明明达标了，但开挖现场还是有异味，周边居民投诉不断。请问在验收标准中，除了关注重金属和SVOC，对于感官上的异味（臭气浓度）有没有量化的评判标准？如何界定是‘心理作用’还是真的‘残留污染’？","2026-04-28T10:31:50+08:00",64,"2026-04-28T17:55:07+08:00",{"id":27,"articleNo":28,"categoryId":6,"categoryName":7,"title":29,"summary":30,"publishTime":31,"isTop":12,"isHot":12,"isRecommend":12,"viewCount":32,"collectCount":14,"updateTime":33},"1000000000000002625","q626","关于修复目标值的“一刀切”问题","目前很多地方在执行GB 36600的时候，不分青红皂白直接用地表一类或二类标准。对于一些已经停产多年的重工业地块，如果未来规划就是绿地或工业用地，有没有可能在风险评估阶段，通过引入更精细化的暴露参数（比如本地化的土壤摄入率），来制定更科学合理的、非国标的修复目标值，从而降低不必要的修复成本？","2026-04-27T15:51:41+08:00",51,"2026-04-28T17:56:17+08:00",{"id":35,"articleNo":36,"categoryId":6,"categoryName":7,"title":37,"summary":38,"publishTime":39,"isTop":12,"isHot":12,"isRecommend":12,"viewCount":40,"collectCount":14,"updateTime":39},"1000000000000002621","q622","土壤修复项目中，修复目标值、验收标准、风险评估三者经常出现口径不一致，实际操作中如何统一逻辑、避免反复整改？？","土壤修复项目中，修复目标值、验收标准、风险评估三者经常出现口径不一致，实际操作中如何统一逻辑、避免反复整改？","2026-04-21T16:39:59+08:00",55,{"id":42,"articleNo":43,"categoryId":6,"categoryName":7,"title":44,"summary":45,"publishTime":46,"isTop":12,"isHot":12,"isRecommend":12,"viewCount":47,"collectCount":14,"updateTime":46},"1000000000000002608","q609","地下水污染治理中最容易踩坑、失败率较高的环节通常在哪里？","地下水污染治理中最容易踩坑、失败率较高的环节通常在哪里？？","2026-04-08T22:42:40+08:00",59,{"id":49,"articleNo":50,"categoryId":6,"categoryName":7,"title":51,"summary":52,"publishTime":53,"isTop":12,"isHot":12,"isRecommend":12,"viewCount":54,"collectCount":14,"updateTime":53},"1000000000000002599","q600","怎么快速判断现场土壤是否存在疑似污染？低成本可操作方法有哪些？","怎么快速判断现场土壤是否存在疑似污染？低成本可操作方法有哪些？？","2026-03-30T15:20:10+08:00",57,33,1,5,null]